ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Complex kinship testing using the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderate-density SNPs combined with machine learning method driven kinship identification and East Asian subpopulations discrimination analysis.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a Multiplex Amplification System Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing for STRs and InDels.Human mutation · 2026Article
- An X-ray bone age assessment method for hands and wrists of adolescents in Western China based on feature fusion deep learning models.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disaster victim identification and criminal investigations have intensified the demand of complex kinship testing. Compared to close relatives, distant relatives share fewer identical-by-descent genetic segments; therefore, more genetic markers are required to improve the system effectiveness. Driven by the progress of next-generation sequencing, several commercial or in-house panels, including a large number of genetic markers, have been developed and applied in forensic caseworks. However, few efficient panels are available for first cousins (FC) kinship testing. Here, we adopted the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit, a two-step multiplex PCR strategy to detect 2,009 SNPs, and evaluated their system effectiveness in complex kinship analysis. Samples from 10,000 pairs of relatives and unrelated individuals were simulated to evaluate the system power. Simultaneously, real samples were used to further confirm this, including 72 pairs of full siblings (FS), 52 pairs of uncle/aunt/-niece/nephew (UN), 92 pairs of FC, 79 pairs of first cousin once removed (1C1R), and 780 pairs of unrelated individuals. The results showed that this kit was sufficiently powerful in FS, UN, and FC versus unrelated kinship testing and could also discriminate part of 1C1R relatives against unrelated individuals. This method was also powerful in the kinship determination of FS versus UN, FS versus FC, FS versus 1C1R, and UN versus 1C1R kinship testing but had limited power to determine UN versus FC and FC versus 1C1R relationships. This study provides an effective strategy and guidance for complex kinship analysis in forensic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39661160What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.