ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2024
Dyslipidemia progression and increased lung cancer risk: a prospective cohort study.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Female-specific risk factors for lung cancer: insights from the All of Us Research Program.BMC public health · 2026Article
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- From metabolic syndrome to survival: a prognostic model for PDAC incorporating insulin resistance markers and pathological variables.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association of cholesterol and triglyceride levels with the recurrence of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary pattern.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Adolescent Obesity and Charlson Comorbidity Index in Young Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the associations of changes in lipidemic profile with the risk of lung cancer incidence, and to elucidate how modifiable risk factors contribute to the associations. DESIGN AND
participantsThe prospective study enrolled a cohort of 137,075 individuals with lipidemic profiles spanning from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2006 in the Taiwan MJ Cohort. Follow-up was extended from the second clinical visit until December 31, 2007, with an average duration of 6.3 years. Participants was divided into four groups based on alterations in their lipidemic profile within a 1-3 year interval subsequent to initial enrollment. The associations of changes in lipidemic profiles with the incidence of lung cancer were assessed with Cox proportional hazard models. Associations between modifiable risk factors and lipidemic profile changes were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models.
resultsOf 137,075 participants with lipidemic profile, progression to dyslipidemia within a 3-year period was associated with elevated risks of lung cancer incidence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.10) in comparison to persistent normolipidemic. However, reversion to normolipidemic did not contribute to a decreased lung cancer incidence risk (HR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.63), in comparison to persistent dyslipidemia. Body mass index and smoking as risk factors, along with physical activity as a protective factor, were associated with changes in lipidemic profile.
conclusionsWithin this large-scale cohort, progression to dyslipidemia emerged as a risk factor for lung cancer incidence, highlighting the significance of lipid control. The modifiable risk factors associated with dyslipidemia progression encompassed body mass index, physical activity, and smoking status, suggesting potential interventions targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39661098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.