Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39660964›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Speech and language therapist-led clinics for low-risk suspected head and neck cancer referrals: A qualitative study of ear, nose and throat surgeons' views.

Louise C Occomore-Kent, John C Hardman, Justin W G Roe, Paula Bradley, Paul N Carding, Joanne M Patterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A cross-sectional retrospective and prospective service evaluation of head and neck cancer patients' swallowing and quality of life concerns: are we doing enough?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. An exploration of nursing and Allied Health Professional (AHP)-led post-treatment surveillance and survivorship care for people with head and neck cancer-a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louise C Occomore-KentCity St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6212-5461
John C HardmanThe Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6591-5119
Justin W G RoeThe Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-3124
Paula BradleyUniversity of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-1053
Paul N CardingOxford Institute of Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4206-1827
Joanne M PattersonUniversity of Liverpool & Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8898-8292

Funding

This study was supported by a research grant from the British Association of Head and Neck Oncologists (BAHNO)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 200,000 patients are referred onto the suspected head and neck cancer (HNC) pathway annually in the UK, with around 3% receiving a cancer diagnosis. With new HNC advancements in identifying patients at low risk of a cancer diagnosis, one proposal is a speech and language therapy (SLT)-led first point of contact clinic for low-risk patients presenting with voice or swallowing symptoms.

aimsTo explore ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeons' views regarding this model. MATERIALS &

methodsThe study used a qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews. Transcribed responses were analysed using thematic analysis. OUTCOMES &

resultsA total of 11 UK ENT surgeons participated. Themes included the positives and challenges of the proposed model; existing facilitators that increase the likelihood of success; and the requirements for successful implementation. Service variation impacted level of interest. Waiting times were problematic at some sites more than others; SLT workforce issues were of differing prevalence; SLT competence and interest differed; and support from organizational leaders varied. Participants' personal views also varied, for example, acceptability of the model to patients, or what governance structure is required. There was no single SLT-led clinic model suitable for all centres; however, some general principles were identified to inform further evaluation and implementation of this model. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Principles included the deployment of SLTs experienced in laryngeal examination and flexible nasendoscopy; dedicated job plans and workforce; professional and regulatory body recognition and support; and clear training, supervision structure and job description for the role. Service outcomes, training protocol and competencies require robust evaluation. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a risk calculator tool was developed to identify patients at highest risk of cancer who were referred to the 2-week-wait (2ww) ENT pathway. These patients require urgent face to face ENT assessment. Lower risk patients with voice and swallowing difficulties still require management of their symptoms and an SLT-led clinic model is one potential solution for this population. While SLTs' views of this model have been explored with a UK-wide survey and focus groups, ENT surgeons' perspectives are yet to be investigated. What this study adds to the existing knowledge This study explores ENT surgeons' views regarding SLT-led clinics for patients who are referred through the 2ww ENT pathway, stratified as being at low risk of cancer, and with voice and/or swallowing symptoms of likely benign aetiology. Participants shared many positive perceptions of the clinic along with factors that they felt would enhance its success (facilitators). Key requirements for the success of this clinic model were also highlighted, along with challenges that need to be addressed. What are the practical and clinical implications of this work? The need for this clinic model varied by centre. However, general principles included the importance of a dedicated workforce with pre-existing relevant expertise; and a clear role profile, training process and competencies framework. Professional, statutory and regulatory bodies' recognition of the role is required, and robust evaluation of the model is necessary.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHead and Neck NeoplasmsLanguage TherapyQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationSpeech TherapyDeglutition DisordersFemaleHumansMaleOtolaryngologistsSpeech-Language PathologyUnited KingdomVoice Disordersassessmentdysphagiahead and neck cancerinterviewoncologyotolaryngologyspeech therapyvoicevoice disorders

Identifiers

PMID39660964
PMCPMC11633375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.