SynthesisProsthetics and orthotics international2024
The efficacy of lower limb orthoses on quality of life, well-being, and participation following stroke: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is the main cause of acquired adult disability globally, with motor impairment affecting 80% of people after stroke. To regain mobility, diminish falls, and improve quality of life (QoL), after a stroke, orthoses are recommended. Most studies, to date, have focused on the positive impact of ankle-foot orthoses on spatial-temporal, kinematic, and kinetic outcomes. The objective of this review is to assess the evidence of the effects of lower-extremity orthoses on perceptions of QoL, psychological well-being, and social participation after stroke. The following databases were used to search the literature: CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed, between 1990 and 2022. Previous reviews and reference lists were also screened. Information on the trial design, sample characteristics, information of orthoses used, outcome measures, and results were extracted. Critical appraisal was conducted using SIGN guidelines. Ten articles were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The effect of orthoses on QoL was inconsistent: 4 articles reported a positive relationship, one found a negative relationship, and 3 did not find any relationship. Six of 7 articles reported a positive relationship between the use of orthoses and psychological well-being and participation, although the level of evidence was low. This literature review has identified a small number of articles addressing the research question. Furthermore, varied study designs, low levels of evidence seen, the variation in follow-up times, and the limited information about the fitting and appropriateness of the orthoses in the studies highlight that more research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.