Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39660810›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025

Comparison of the molecular FluoroType Mycobacteria VER 1.0 and the Maldi BioTyper Mycobacteria assays for the identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria.

Jennifer Guiraud, Caroline Piau, Cécilia Enault, Emilie Nkpa Charron, Danièle Ducos, Christine Lafuente, Armelle Ménard, Olivia Peuchant

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer GuiraudLaboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-3265
Caroline PiauLaboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2937-2452
Cécilia EnaultGroupe Hospitalier Universitaire Carémeau, Service de Microbiologie et hygiène hospitalière, Nîmes, France.
Emilie Nkpa CharronLaboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Danièle DucosLaboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Christine LafuenteLaboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Armelle MénardLaboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Olivia PeuchantLaboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-8990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification of non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) species is crucial for the diagnosis and appropriate management of NTM infections. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of two assays, FluoroType Mycobacteria VER 1.0 and Maldi BioTyper (MBT) Mycobacteria. The two assays were evaluated using 119 NTM, including 85 slow-growing mycobacteria and 34 rapid-growing mycobacteria, representing a total of 33 species isolated in three French clinical laboratories. We used the GenoType assays as reference method for species identification, followed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing if the GenoType kits returned

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesBacteriological TechniquesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousNontuberculous MycobacteriaSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationDNA, BacterialFranceGenotypeHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SdiagnosisFluoroTypeidentificationMALDI-TOF MSnontuberculous mycobacteria

Identifiers

PMID39660810
PMCPMC11784439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.