ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024
Involving Patients in Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment of Innovative Medical Devices: Adapting to a Specific Local Context and Lessons Learned From the Assessment of an Ex Vivo Perfusion System of Human Donor Hearts.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- International practices, barriers, and enablers for patient and public involvement in pricing and reimbursement decision-making: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA demand from the cardiac surgery and heart transplantation department of a French (Lyon) university hospital to adopt an ex-vivo perfusion system of human donor hearts was a chance to actively involve patients in our hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) process. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe selected an existing framework for patient involvement in HB-HTA and involved patients at two stages of the HB-HTA process: evaluation and dissemination. Firstly, we conducted a consultation-oriented workshop to gather patient perspectives on the introduction of the technology in our hospital, based on their significant experience of healthcare. Secondly, we organized an information-oriented workshop to communicate the HB-HTA results to the patients consulted, after the decision had been taken.
resultsWe modified the framework for patient involvement to suit the local decision-making context, the HB-HTA methodology, and the type of technologies assessed in our institution. Patients perceived the ex-vivo perfusion system as a promising technology to facilitate access to heart transplantation. They emphasized the importance of a tailored information provided to patients about the potential use of the technology in their healthcare trajectories, and suggested involvement of patients to facilitate its implementation in hospitals. DISCUSSION: Modifying existing frameworks for patient involvement to fit specific local contexts should be encouraged, and has to address the need of timely information for decision-makers and patient recruitment issues. Decision to incorporate patient perspectives and experiences should be made on a project-by-project basis, and focus on innovative medical devices with expected significant impact on patient quality of life. Effective and transparent communication and prospective feedbacks from HB-HTA producers to patients are essential for a successful process. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Three patients with a lived experience of heart transplantation, or another transplant procedure, or more broadly procedures involving innovative medical devices (specialists) and two patients recruited for societal issues and legitimacy of a collective voice were involved (generalists).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.