ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2024
Round Window Accessibility Prediction in Cochlear Implant Surgery.
Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global prevalence of high jugular bulb and jugular bulb dehiscence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Anatomical science international · 2026Review
- The prediction of round window visibility at posterior-tympanotomy for cochlear implantation with "black bone" magnetic resonance imaging : Author lists.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clear identification of the round window (RW) through the facial recess is a key surgical step for successful cochlear implantation (CI) surgery, which may be very challenging in some cases. Objective is to predict round window (RW) accessibility during CI surgery using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed preoperative HRCT scans of 142 patients who underwent CI surgery via the standard posterior tympanotomy approach at our ENT Head and Neck Surgery department. Surgical accessibility of the RW was assessed according to 2 methods, similar to the ones introduced by Mandour et al and Elzayat et al. Pre-operative imaging findings were then compared to the actual surgical accessibility of the RW by reviewing surgical notes and video recordings. Results: Difficult surgical access to the RW was correctly predicted in our series by Mandour's method in 81.8% of the cases, with a sensitivity and specificity of 56.3% and 96.4%, respectively, and by Elzayat's method in 72.2% of the cases, with a sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 94.5%, respectively. Combining both methods showed an increase in sensitivity levels (Se=71.9%). When the 2 methods both predicted difficult RW access, there was a strong probability that drilling a cochleostomy would be necessary for safe electrode insertion along the scala tympani of the basal turn of the cochlea (P < .001). Conclusion: These 2 methods are both simple and reliable tools that can help the surgeon anticipate difficult surgical access and prepare for the potential use of alternative techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.