Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39660661›Full record

ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2024

Round Window Accessibility Prediction in Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Salah-Eddine Youbi, Omar Oulghoul, Youssef Lakhdar, Atmane Zaroual, Mohamed Chehbouni, Othmane Benhoummad, Youssef Rochdi, Abdelaziz Raji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The prediction of round window visibility at posterior-tympanotomy for cochlear implantation with "black bone" magnetic resonance imaging : Author lists.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Salah-Eddine YoubiDepartment of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, University Hospital Center Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.
Omar OulghoulDepartment of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, University Hospital Center Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.
Youssef LakhdarDepartment of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, University Hospital Center Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.
Atmane ZaroualDepartment of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, University Hospital Center Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.
Mohamed ChehbouniDepartment of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, University Hospital Center Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.
Othmane BenhoummadDepartment of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Agadir, Ibn Zohr University, University Hospital Center Souss Massa, Agadir, Morocco.
Youssef RochdiDepartment of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, University Hospital Center Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.
Abdelaziz RajiDepartment of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, University Hospital Center Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clear identification of the round window (RW) through the facial recess is a key surgical step for successful cochlear implantation (CI) surgery, which may be very challenging in some cases. Objective is to predict round window (RW) accessibility during CI surgery using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed preoperative HRCT scans of 142 patients who underwent CI surgery via the standard posterior tympanotomy approach at our ENT Head and Neck Surgery department. Surgical accessibility of the RW was assessed according to 2 methods, similar to the ones introduced by Mandour et al and Elzayat et al. Pre-operative imaging findings were then compared to the actual surgical accessibility of the RW by reviewing surgical notes and video recordings. Results: Difficult surgical access to the RW was correctly predicted in our series by Mandour's method in 81.8% of the cases, with a sensitivity and specificity of 56.3% and 96.4%, respectively, and by Elzayat's method in 72.2% of the cases, with a sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 94.5%, respectively. Combining both methods showed an increase in sensitivity levels (Se=71.9%). When the 2 methods both predicted difficult RW access, there was a strong probability that drilling a cochleostomy would be necessary for safe electrode insertion along the scala tympani of the basal turn of the cochlea (P < .001). Conclusion: These 2 methods are both simple and reliable tools that can help the surgeon anticipate difficult surgical access and prepare for the potential use of alternative techniques.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationRound Window, EarTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCochlear ImplantsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCochlear implantationcorrelationround window

Identifiers

PMID39660661
PMCPMC11639601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.