ArticleInternational journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
Adverse reactions of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenesis inhibitors: A pharmacovigilance analysis of drug-drug interactions.
Article in International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolism in the tumor microenvironment: implications for pathogenesis and therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs) is widely used in cancer treatment; however, drug-drug reactions (DDIs) remain unknown. We aimed to identify interaction signals for the concomitant use of ICIs and AGIs. Data were obtained from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. Disproportionality analysis was used for data mining by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Adjusted RORs were analysed using logistic regression analysis, considering age, sex and reporting year. Further confirmation was assessed via additive and multiplicative models. We identified 75,936 reports on ICIs combined with AGIs. Significant interaction signals were observed for hepatobiliary disorders (RORcrude: 5.25, 95% CI: 5.07-5.44, RORadj: 5.01, 95% CI: 4.82-5.22, additive models: 0.2323), investigations (RORcrude: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.62-1.70, RORadj: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.58-1.67, additive models: 0.2187, multiplicative models: 1.1265), renal and urinary disorders (RORcrude: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.80-1.95, RORadj: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.64-1.79, additive models: 0.3239, multiplicative models: 1.1799) and vascular disorders (RORcrude: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.87-2.02, RORadj: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.80-1.95, additive models: 0.5823, multiplicative models: 1.5676). Subset data analysis showed positive interaction signals for PDL-1/CTLA-4 inhibitors + AGI in hepatobiliary disorders, PD-1 inhibitors + AGI in investigations, or PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors + AGI in renal and urinary/ vascular disorders. Based on FAERS data, four systemic disorders were identified as having DDIs related to the combined use of ICIs and AGIs. Pre-clinical trials are required to explore the mechanisms underlying these interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.