ArticleCurrent rheumatology reviews2025
Article in Current rheumatology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) (C1) is a disease with multi-organ involvement that can have a variety of cutaneous manifestations in 76% of cases during the disease. Less than 1% of these patients are diagnosed with confirmed bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (C1). Given the wide differential diagnosis of a bullous lesion, it is imperative to reach a conclusive diagnosis as it can have a direct impact on the course of management of the disease. Here, we present a case of SLE with a CASE PRESENTATION: The case describes the presentation of a young African female of low socioeconomic status with first-ever eruption of bullous lesions on her trunk and groin. The lesions progressed to involve the face. A biopsy was taken, and the patient was started on dapsone and hydroxychloroquine. She initially responded well but soon developed Steven Johnson syndrome in reaction to dapsone. In the meantime, a biopsy and hematological work-up confirmed a diagnosis of Bullous SLE. The patient was started on methotrexate, to which she initially responded well but developed methotrexate-induced cytopenia. This was followed by initiation of mycophenolate, to which the patient responded very well and was subsequently discharged on the same. At the time of discharge, all lesions healed, and the hematological workup remarkably improved.
conclusionAll patients with bullous lesions should be evaluated for bullous SLE. A definitive diagnosis will chart the course of management. Multiple drug options are available, and there is no single hierarchy of medicines that will suit all. Sometimes, multiple modalities need to be tried before the patient achieves clinical remission and then can be continued on the same.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.