Observational studyCurrent cardiology reviews2025
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Observational Study of Risk Factors for Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Observational study in Current cardiology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Right-heart reverse remodeling and heart failure symptom outcomes after catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and functional tricuspid regurgitation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLong-term heart failure hospitalization (HFH) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and its risk factors remain to be investigated.
methodsAF patients with HFpEF who underwent RFCA from January, 2014 to December, 2018 from three centers were retrospectively included. Patients were assigned to the training and testing cohorts, respectively. In the training cohort, logistic regression analyses were performed to discriminate those with and without HFH. A scoring system was developed accordingly and validated.
resultsA total of 417 AF patients with HFpEF receiving RFCA were enrolled. About 35 patients (8.4%) had HFH for 6 years. In the training cohort, the use of diuretics, atrial tachycardia (AT)/AF recurrence, prior HFH, and female sex were independent predictors of HFH in the multivariable analysis. A DAPF score (ranging from 0 to 9.0) was developed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the DAPF score was 0.880 (95% CI, 0.830- 0.929). A DAPF score ≥3.5 could predict HFH with a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 74.6%. The performance in the testing cohort remained robust (AUC, 0.858; 95% CI, 0.749- 0.967).
conclusionHFH in patients with AF and HFpEF after RFCA is not rare. The DAPF score could predict the risk of HFH in AF patients with HFpEF after RFCA and guide our treatment strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.