Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39660343›Full record

ArticleArchives of physiotherapy

Perspectives, perceptions, and expectations of subjects with frozen shoulder: a web-based Italian survey.

Fabrizio Brindisino, Fabiola Garzonio, Andrea Turolla, Arianna Andriesse, Fabrizio Pulina, Davide Cucchi, Filip Struyf, Davide Venturin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physiotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07380087 (Efficacy of Suprascapular Nerve Block on the Tolerability and Effectiveness of Shoulder Hydrodistension in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07380087 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Efficacy of Suprascapular Nerve Block on the Tolerability and Effectiveness of Shoulder Hydrodistension in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade do PortoRan2026 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsAdhesive Capsulitis, Adhesive Capsulitis of Unspecified Shoulder, Adhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder, Frozen ShoulderArmsShoulder Hydrodistention, suprascapular nerve block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fabrizio BrindisinoDepartment of Medicine and Health Science "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8950-8203
Fabiola GarzonioDepartment of Medicine and Health Science "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7265-0692
Andrea TurollaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-8060
Arianna AndriesseMedical Translation Private Practice c/o Andriesse Medical Translator, Lecce - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6087-4436
Fabrizio PulinaPhysiotherapy Private Practice c/o Pulina Physiotherapist, Genova - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2059-3447
Davide CucchiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn - Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6284-7977
Filip StruyfDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk - Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-9684
Davide VenturinDepartment of Medicine and Health Science "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso - Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a musculoskeletal disorder affecting the glenohumeral joint. This condition leads to disability and a worsening in quality of life. Despite its considerable impact on patients and its economic burden, research on the psychological and social implications of FS-as well as patients' perspectives and needs-is limited. This study aims to explore the perspectives, perceptions, and expectations of individuals suffering from FS, providing a comprehensive understanding of their experiences and needs. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted following STROBE guidelines. A 59-question survey was administered to Italian individuals diagnosed with FS from April 1 to July 1, 2023. Results: All 110 participants completed the survey. Most preferred an experienced and empathetic physiotherapist (73.64%) and relied primarily on physiotherapy (49.09%) for FS management. Additionally, 45.45% were open to a multidisciplinary approach. Subjects reported reducing night pain (71.82%) and achieving full range of motion (ROM) recovery (70.91%) as their top priorities. Participants reported a notable shift in their mood from "pre" to "post" FS, with many experiencing fear and catastrophizing thoughts and perceiving a lack of social support. Furthermore, 27.27% were open to cortisone use, while 25.45% considered electrophysical agents beneficial for managing the painful phase of FS. Conclusion: These results underscore a strong preference for empathetic physiotherapists and the value of a multidisciplinary approach. Addressing night pain and restoring ROM are crucial priorities-emphasizing the need for tailored and shared decision-making. Additionally, these findings highlight the importance of addressing psychological well-being alongside physical symptoms.

Indexed as

Adhesive capsulitisFrozen shoulderIrritable moodPsychologicalRehabilitationStress

Identifiers

PMID39660343
PMCPMC11629370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.