Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39660323›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology2024

MR Imaging for Ectopic Pregnancy.

Jung Joo Hong, Sung Bin Park, Hyun Jeong Park, Eun Sun Lee, Min Ju Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is diagnosed based on laboratory values and ultrasonography (US) findings. Evaluation for suspected EP should begin with a quantitative measurement of the serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels and transvaginal US. MR imaging is not preferentially performed in the evaluation of EP; however, if the findings of transvaginal US are uncertain, MR imaging can be used, as it has the advantages of superior soft-tissue contrast resolution and a wide scanning range. Identifying the exact location of implantation transfer using MR imaging can help in the diagnosis and establishment of treatment strategies for ectopic pregnancies, including laparoscopy. In particular, as the incidence of heterotopic pregnancy has increased with the recent increase in use of assisted reproductive technology, the scope of application of MR imaging is expected to expand further. This pictorial essay describes the various manifestations of EP and related conditions on MR imaging and US. Familiarity with the clinical setting and the US and MR imaging features of EP and associated conditions can lead to a more accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Ectopic PregnancyHeterotopic PregnancyMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39660323
PMCPMC11625838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.