Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39660219›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Optimizing bioprocessing efficiency with OptFed: Dynamic nonlinear modeling improves product-to-biomass yield.

Guido Schlögel, Rüdiger Lück, Stefan Kittler, Oliver Spadiut, Julian Kopp, Jürgen Zanghellini, Mathias Gotsmy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-scale design and optimization of antibody production via flexible nets.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guido SchlögelDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University Vienna, Währinger Straße, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Rüdiger LückIntegrated Bioprocess Development, Technical University Vienna, Getreidemarkt 9, 1060 Vienna, Austria.
Stefan KittlerIntegrated Bioprocess Development, Technical University Vienna, Getreidemarkt 9, 1060 Vienna, Austria.
Oliver SpadiutIntegrated Bioprocess Development, Technical University Vienna, Getreidemarkt 9, 1060 Vienna, Austria.
Julian KoppIntegrated Bioprocess Development, Technical University Vienna, Getreidemarkt 9, 1060 Vienna, Austria.
Jürgen ZanghelliniDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University Vienna, Währinger Straße, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Mathias GotsmyDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University Vienna, Währinger Straße, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biotechnological production of recombinant molecules relies heavily on fed-batch processes. However, as the cells' growth, substrate uptake, and production kinetics are often unclear, the fed-batches are frequently operated under sub-optimal conditions. Process design is based on simple feed profiles (e.g., constant or exponential), operator experience, and basic statistical tools (e.g., response surface methodology), which are unable to harvest the full potential of production. To address this challenge, we propose a general modeling framework, OptFed, which utilizes experimental data from non-optimal fed-batch processes to predict an optimal one. In detail, we assume that cell-specific rates depend on several state variables and their derivatives. Using measurements of bioreactor volume, biomass, and product, we fit the kinetic constants of ordinary differential equations. A regression model avoids overfitting by reducing the number of parameters. Thereafter, OptFed predicts optimal process conditions by solving an optimal control problem using orthogonal collocation and nonlinear programming. In a case study, we apply OptFed to a recombinant protein L fed-batch production process. We determine optimal controls for feed rate and reactor temperature to maximize the product-to-biomass yield and successfully validate our predictions experimentally. Notably, our framework outperforms RSM in both simulation and experiments, capturing an optimum previously missed. We improve the experimental product-to-biomass ratio by 19% and showcase OptFed's potential for enhancing process optimization in biotechnology.

Indexed as

BioproductionFed-batchNon-linear optimizationProcess design

Identifiers

PMID39660219
PMCPMC11630647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.