ArticleLe infezioni in medicina2024
Evaluation of a training program on hand hygiene for healthcare workers in a second-level hospital in southern Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Le infezioni in medicina, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health care-associated infections (HAIs), albeit being the most frequent adverse event in health care, are mostly preventable through hand hygiene (HH). Given the extremely low HH compliance among healthcare workers (HCWs), educational initiatives aimed at this group are crucial. This study used an ultraviolet (UV)-based technology to assess the efficacy of an educational and training program on HH for HCWs in a second-level hospital in southern Italy. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted between November 2020 and February 2022. Participants were asked to rub their hands with an UV-labelled disinfectant solution before having digital images of both sides of their hands taken under UV-A light, using a device that recorded the solution's distribution on each surface before and after the training session. The instrument recorded the percentage of surface covered (quantitative data) for each measurement along with the eventual passing of the 95% threshold (qualitative data). Results: Following the training session, we observed a significant increase in the number of valid procedures as well as the mean coverage (expressed as the percentage of surface covered) for each surface examined. From 16.9% in the pre-interventional phase to 48.7% in the post-interventional phase, the percentage of HCWs who exceeded the 95% threshold on both sides of hands increased significantly (p<0,001). Conclusions: The findings of our study show that the training intervention was effective in raising participants HH performance. Secondly, they suggest that giving HCWs immediate visual feedback on their progress throughout the learning process could help increase HH adequacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.