ReviewRheumatology advances in practice2024
Rationale and concerns for using JAK inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis.
Review in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) collaborative care involving acupuncture for axial spondyloarthritis: 6-week exploratory results of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Ambiguities in the effect of physical activity on bone remodelling in spondyloarthritis.Reumatologia · 2026Review
- Real-world clinical experience with upadacitinib in a cohort of Italian patients with axial spondyloarthritis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Saudi Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease.Rheumatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Profiling of Cytokines and Growth Factors: Pathogenic Roles and Clinical Applications in Autoimmune Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Ivarmacitinib improves patient-reported outcomes across multiple domains in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: aFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic illness with limited treatment options. The role of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition as a therapeutic option has increasingly become a focus of research in recent years as they have brought a new mode of action to the clinical armamentarium. This review assesses the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs in axSpA. The current phase 2 and 3 clinical trials data are summarized across tofacitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib. Moreover, the safety profiles of these drugs, in the context of emerging safety signals such as during the ORAL surveillance study, are reviewed. In summary, JAK inhibitors offer a novel therapeutic target for axSpA and appear to address some of the unmet needs for patients who have either failed to respond to current treatment options or in whom they are contraindicated. There is a relative lack of evidence in non-radiographic axSpA and longer-term trials are needed to establish true efficacy and safety profile in radiographic axSpA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.