ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2024
Lung volume reduction: surgery
Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Connecting the dots: historical perspective on lung volume reduction.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- ERS Congress 2025: highlights from the Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Assembly.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Bronchoscopic endobronchial valves.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
- Pulmonary Emphysema: Current Understanding of Disease Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Approaches.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- SeparSEPAR (Sociedad Española de Neumologia y Cirugía Torácica) Clinical Protocol on Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction for Severe Emphysema.Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Volume reduction is a disease-modifying treatment that aims to reshape the diseased lung towards a more normal total lung capacity by removing severely damaged and overinflated lung parenchyma. It is an effective therapeutic strategy in well-selected patients, resulting in improvements in exercise tolerance, lung function, quality of life and survival. The most widespread strategies for volume reduction are either video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or bronchoscopic lung volume reduction. It is crucial to decide which approach would be more suitable for specific patients, as this is related to the outcome of the procedure. Factors like emphysema distribution on computed tomography, the presence or absence of collateral ventilation, the patient's pulmonary function tests, a history of other comorbidities and previous interventions might all influence the choice of procedure. It is crucial that this decision is taken by a multidisciplinary expert team to have the best outcome and fewer complications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.