ArticlePNAS nexus2024
In silico screening of protein-binding peptides with an application to developing peptide inhibitors against antibiotic resistance.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Docking-based virtual screening: Past, present, and future.Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- De novo generation and computational screening of dual-targeting short peptide inhibitors against PBP2b and PBP2x in drug-resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Directed evolution of functional intrinsically disordered proteins.Nature chemical biology · 2026Article
- Establishing a combined rational design protocol for the discovery of novel peptide binders of FGF7.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Molecular Modelling in Bioactive Peptide Discovery and Characterisation.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The field of therapeutic peptides is experiencing a surge, fueled by their advantageous features. These include predictable metabolism, enhanced safety profile, high selectivity, and reduced off-target effects compared with small-molecule drugs. Despite progress in addressing limitations associated with peptide drugs, a significant bottleneck remains: the absence of a large-scale in silico screening method for a given protein target structure. Such methods have proven invaluable in accelerating small-molecule drug discovery. The high flexibility of peptide structures and the large diversity of peptide sequences greatly hinder the development of urgently needed computational methods. Here, we report a method called MDockPeP2_VS to address these challenges. It integrates molecular docking with structural conservation between protein folding and protein-peptide binding. Briefly, we discovered that when the interfacial residues are conserved, a sequence fragment derived from a monomeric protein exhibits a high propensity to bind a target protein with a similar conformation. This valuable insight significantly reduces the search space for peptide conformations, resulting in a substantial reduction in computational time and making in silico peptide screening practical. We applied MDockPeP2_VS to develop peptide inhibitors targeting the TEM-1 β-lactamase of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.