ArticlePNAS nexus2024
Disagreement on foundational principles of biological aging.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring and increasing the brain health span across adulthood: a public health imperative.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- An integrated resource for systems-level analysis of aging hallmarks and associated genes.Biogerontology · 2026Article
- Enhanced chromatin compaction is associated with de novo expression of a nuclear microprotein, global loss of H3 acetylation and local transcriptional changes in retinal rod photoreceptors.Research square · 2026Article
- An aging essential 8: closing the gap between geroscience and the public it serves.Biogerontology · 2026Review
- Embracing non-linearity in human ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Impact of older donor age in kidney transplants in a biopsy-based observational study.JCI insight · 2026Observational
- Hyperspectral imaging and healthy aging: an observational study using hand skin as surface for monitoring healthy aging processes.Biogerontology · 2026Observational
- Social determinants of health and epigenetic clocks: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 140 studies.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Clashing Perspectives? Two Approaches to the Desirability of Biological Aging.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
- Probing buccal-customized epigenetic clocks to investigate socioeconomic and health disparities.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Open problems in ageing science: a roadmap for biogerontology.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Cellular senescence as a therapeutic target for aging intervention.Biomedical journal · 2026Review
- Proteomic aging clocks in epidemiological studies: advances, applications and prospects.Nature aging · 2026Review
- Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Patterns Predict Age in the Zebra Shark (Stegostoma tigrinum) and Provide Insight Into the Evolution of Vertebrate Aging.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Shoulder Complex Dysfunction Through an Evolutionary Lens: The Need for Closed Kinetic Chain Loading in Upper Extremity Program Design.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Brain Age in Adult Patients With Early-Treated Phenylketonuria.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
- Mechanistic redundancy and hierarchy of aging mechanisms: implications for strategies to extend healthspan and biomarker integration.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Aging as Entropy: A Quantifiable Framework.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
81 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To gain insight into how researchers of aging perceive the process they study, we conducted a survey among experts in the field. While highlighting some common features of aging, the survey exposed broad disagreement on the foundational issues. What is aging? What causes it? When does it begin? What constitutes rejuvenation? Not only was there no consensus on these and other core questions, but none of the questions received a majority opinion-even regarding the need for consensus itself. Despite many researchers believing they understand aging, their understanding diverges considerably. Importantly, as different processes are labeled as "aging" by researchers, different experimental approaches are prioritized. The survey shed light on the need to better define which aging processes this field should target and what its goals are. It also allowed us to categorize contemporary views on aging and rejuvenation, revealing critical, yet largely unanswered, questions that appear disconnected from the current research focus. Finally, we discuss ways to address the disagreement, which we hope will ultimately aid progress in the field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.