ArticleISME communications2024
Organelles in the ointment: improved detection of cryptic mitochondrial reads resolves many unknown sequences in cross-species microbiome analyses.
Article in ISME communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Mother Provide? Re-Examination of Maternal and Embryonic Microbiomes ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genomes of mitochondria and chloroplasts contain ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, reflecting their ancestry as free-living bacteria. These organellar rRNAs are often amplified in microbiome studies of animals and plants. If identified, they can be discarded, merely reducing sequencing depth. However, we identify certain high-abundance organeller RNAs not identified by common pipelines, which may compromise statistical analysis of microbiome structure and diversity. We quantified this by reanalyzing 7459 samples from seven 16S rRNA studies, including microbiomes from 927 unique animal genera. We find that under-annotation of cryptic mitochondrial and chloroplast reads affects multiple of these large-scale cross-species microbiome comparisons, and varies between host species, biasing comparisons. We offer a straightforward solution: supplementing existing taxonomies with diverse organelle rRNA sequences. This resolves up to 97% of unique unclassified sequences in some entire studies as mitochondrial (14% averaged across all studies), without increasing false positive annotations in mitochondria-free mock communities. Improved annotation decreases the proportion of unknown sequences by ≥10-fold in 2262 of 7459 samples (30%), spanning five of seven major studies examined. We recommend leveraging organelle sequence diversity to better identify organelle gene sequences in microbiome studies, and provide code, data resources and tutorials that implement this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.