ArticleJAMIA open2024
Decoding disparities: evaluating automatic speech recognition system performance in transcribing Black and White patient verbal communication with nurses in home healthcare.
Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- SpeechDETECT: an explainable automated speech processing pipeline for early detection of neurological and health changes.Health information science and systems · 2026Article
- Bridging the trust-adoption gap for AI scribes in rural communities: A machine learning approach using the 2024 Canadian digital health survey.International journal of medical informatics · 2026Article
- The Promise of Ambient AI Technology in Medical Education: Opportunities and Guardrails.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- For the record: a narrative review of ambient voice technology in clinical documentation for dentistry and wider healthcare.British dental journal · 2026Review
- Propagation of Interpreter Errors by Ambient AI Scribes: Study Using Simulated Clinical Encounters.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Assessing the Reliability, Accuracy, and Relevance of Artificial Intelligence Speech Recognition for Clinical Documentation: A Scoping Review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- From Clinical Encounter to Draft Documentation: A Mechanistic Narrative Review of Ambient Scribe Technology.Cureus · 2026Review
- Beyond Time Saved: Implementation, Equity, and the Utility Threshold for Nursing AI Scribes.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Does Recording Hardware Matter for Clinical Speech Recognition? Evaluating ASR Performance Across Consumer Devices.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Automatic Speech Recognition in Healthcare in the Post-LLM Era: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluating LingualAI: a prospective validation of AI-based real-time translation against certified human interpreters.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Accent related errors in clinical speech transcription and a LLM-based remedy.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Ethical considerations for clinical adoption of ambient digital scribe technology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- A function-based framework for AI-amplified, data-driven healthcare simulation research.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Developing a Multimodal Screening Algorithm for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Dementia in Home Health Care: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study Using Speech Analysis, Large Language Models, and Electronic Health Records.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Implementation of Ambient AI Scribes in Hospitals: Lessons for Healthcare Leadership, Governance, and Change Management.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
- Cross-model disagreement as a reference-free signal for prioritizing human review in medical speech transcription.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Exploring opportunities to improve health equity with machine learning and artificial intelligence in healthcare epidemiology.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: As artificial intelligence evolves, integrating speech processing into home healthcare (HHC) workflows is increasingly feasible. Audio-recorded communications enhance risk identification models, with automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems as a key component. This study evaluates the transcription accuracy and equity of 4 ASR systems-Amazon Web Services (AWS) General, AWS Medical, Whisper, and Wave2Vec-in transcribing patient-nurse communication in US HHC, focusing on their ability in accurate transcription of speech from Black and White English-speaking patients. Materials and Methods: We analyzed audio recordings of patient-nurse encounters from 35 patients (16 Black and 19 White) in a New York City-based HHC service. Overall, 860 utterances were available for study, including 475 drawn from Black patients and 385 from White patients. Automatic speech recognition performance was measured using word error rate (WER), benchmarked against a manual gold standard. Disparities were assessed by comparing ASR performance across racial groups using the linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC) tool, focusing on 10 linguistic dimensions, as well as specific speech elements including repetition, filler words, and proper nouns (medical and nonmedical terms). Results: The average age of participants was 67.8 years (SD = 14.4). Communication lasted an average of 15 minutes (range: 11-21 minutes) with a median of 1186 words per patient. Of 860 total utterances, 475 were from Black patients and 385 from White patients. Amazon Web Services General had the highest accuracy, with a median WER of 39%. However, all systems showed reduced accuracy for Black patients, with significant discrepancies in LIWC dimensions such as "Affect," "Social," and "Drives." Amazon Web Services Medical performed best for medical terms, though all systems have difficulties with filler words, repetition, and nonmedical terms, with AWS General showing the lowest error rates at 65%, 64%, and 53%, respectively. Discussion: While AWS systems demonstrated superior accuracy, significant disparities by race highlight the need for more diverse training datasets and improved dialect sensitivity. Addressing these disparities is critical for ensuring equitable ASR performance in HHC settings and enhancing risk prediction models through audio-recorded communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.