Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659966›Full record

ReviewTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2024

Opinions on the Future of Clinical Pig Kidney Xenotransplantation.

Georg A Böhmig, Matthias Diebold, Klemens Budde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transplantation Beyond Species: The Present and Future of Xenotransplantation.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georg A BöhmigDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias DieboldDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Klemens BuddeDepartment of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on promising results obtained in primate models, pioneers in the US have now started to explore the new frontier of genetically-edited pig-to-human transplantation. The recent transition of xenotransplantation into clinical medicine has included transplants in brain-dead subjects and the compassionate use of xenotransplants in living recipients without options for allotransplantation. While the barrier of hyperacute rejection seems to be successfully overcome by gene editing of donor pigs, the occurrence of accelerated rejection could pose significant limitations to the success of the procedure. Ultimately, the establishment of efficient and safe strategies to overcome immunologic barriers will, among other critical factors, such as potential xenozoonotic disease transmission or physiological differences, determine whether and for which indications xenotransplantation will be viable. Considering preliminary outcomes of compassionate use xenotransplantions, which may raise questions about how faithfully data from non-human primate models translate into human outcomes, further research in decedents may be necessary before proceeding with additional clinical transplants. Looking ahead, designing systematic trials in xenotransplantation, including the definition of acceptable eligibility criteria for such high-risk transplants, will be an immense challenge, especially in kidney transplantation, where dialysis provides an effective alternative to transplantation in most cases.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionKidney TransplantationTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGene EditingGraft SurvivalHeterograftsHumansSwineclinical transplantationdecedent modelgene-edited pigsrejectiontrial design

Identifiers

PMID39659966
PMCPMC11628295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.