ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024
Adjuvant osimertinib therapy guided by ctDNA-assessed MRD in resected EGFR-mutated stage IA-IIA non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized clinical trial study protocol.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimal residual disease combined with radiological tumor volume as a tool for identification of resected NSCLC patients at high risk of recurrence.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- The Adjuvant-Phase Dilemma After Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Resectable NSCLC: Evidence and Response-Guided Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- [Research Advances in ctDNA-MRD Monitoring in Local Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Comparative efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX vs. FLOT following neoadjuvant FLOT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWe investigate the value of postoperative minimal residual disease (MRD) detection using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in guiding adjuvant therapy for patients with potentially high recurrence risk in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to the presence of MRD. PATIENTS AND
methodsA randomized controlled trial will enroll stage IA-IIA NSCLC patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutation and negative resection margins to evaluate the clinical value of MRD in guiding adjuvant osimertinib. That is, if the patient's peripheral blood does not show ctDNA (negative) after next generation sequencing (NGS) testing, postoperative observation and follow-up are sufficient. Conversely, if ctDNA is positive, the patient will be randomly assigned to two groups and receive adjuvant treatment with osimertinib or observation and follow-up. In total 1068 postoperative patients should be recruited, finally, 32 MRD positive patients were divided into a treatment group or an observation group. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints: 2- and 5-year PFS rates, regimen safety, and tolerability. Exploratory indicator in the MRD-positive group: ctDNA clearance rate at 12 and 24 months. RESULTS AND
conclusionsThis study provides crucial insights into therapy guidance for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with MRD, potentially enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.