ArticleFundamental research2023
A novel pure data-selection framework for day-ahead wind power forecasting.
Article in Fundamental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerical weather prediction (NWP) data possess internal inaccuracies, such as low NWP wind speed corresponding to high actual wind power generation. This study is intended to reduce the negative effects of such inaccuracies by proposing a pure data-selection framework (PDF) to choose useful data prior to modeling, thus improving the accuracy of day-ahead wind power forecasting. Briefly, we convert an entire NWP training dataset into many small subsets and then select the best subset combination via a validation set to build a forecasting model. Although a small subset can increase selection flexibility, it can also produce billions of subset combinations, resulting in computational issues. To address this problem, we incorporated metamodeling and optimization steps into PDF. We then proposed a design and analysis of the computer experiments-based metamodeling algorithm and heuristic-exhaustive search optimization algorithm, respectively.Experimental results demonstrate that (1) it is necessary to select data before constructing a forecasting model; (2) using a smaller subset will likely increase selection flexibility, leading to a more accurate forecasting model; (3) PDF can generate a better training dataset than similarity-based data selection methods (e.g.,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.