Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659895›Full record

ArticleFundamental research2023

A novel pure data-selection framework for day-ahead wind power forecasting.

Ying Chen, Jingjing Zhao, Jiancheng Qin, Hua Li, Zili Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fundamental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying ChenSchool of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Jingjing ZhaoSchool of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Jiancheng QinSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001,China.
Hua LiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Texas 78363, USA.
Zili ZhangSchool of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerical weather prediction (NWP) data possess internal inaccuracies, such as low NWP wind speed corresponding to high actual wind power generation. This study is intended to reduce the negative effects of such inaccuracies by proposing a pure data-selection framework (PDF) to choose useful data prior to modeling, thus improving the accuracy of day-ahead wind power forecasting. Briefly, we convert an entire NWP training dataset into many small subsets and then select the best subset combination via a validation set to build a forecasting model. Although a small subset can increase selection flexibility, it can also produce billions of subset combinations, resulting in computational issues. To address this problem, we incorporated metamodeling and optimization steps into PDF. We then proposed a design and analysis of the computer experiments-based metamodeling algorithm and heuristic-exhaustive search optimization algorithm, respectively.Experimental results demonstrate that (1) it is necessary to select data before constructing a forecasting model; (2) using a smaller subset will likely increase selection flexibility, leading to a more accurate forecasting model; (3) PDF can generate a better training dataset than similarity-based data selection methods (e.g.,

Indexed as

Data selectionDay-ahead wind power forecastingDesign and analysis of computer experimentsHeuristic optimizationNumerical weather prediction data

Identifiers

PMID39659895
PMCPMC11630709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.