ReviewNature and science of sleep2024
Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment on Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Nature and science of sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between circadian rhythm sleep disorders and dry eye disease: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The impact of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome on corneal sensitivity and dry eye parameters: a comprehensive analysis.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The Link between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Dry Eye Disease: Pathophysiology and Current Updates.Ophthalmic research · 2026Review
- Article
- Impact of Ambient Air Pollution on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery: A Longitudinal Study.ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been reported to influence the ocular surface and may lead to dry eye disease (DED). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line conservative treatment for OSA. However, CPAP might also have mask-related side effects that could deteriorate DED simultaneously. This study investigated the impact of OSA on DED (Aim 1), and CPAP on DED (Aim 2). Five databases were searched for articles published up to May, 2024. OSA severity, CPAP usage, and DED parameters, including tear breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer test, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), and Corneal Fluorescence Staining Score (CFS), were analyzed. For Aim 1, the random-effects model was used for meta-analysis, and the leave-one-out method was used for sensitivity analysis. For Aim 2, a narrative synthesis with critical appraisal of the literature was performed. Eleven studies with 1,526 patients for Aim 1 and three studies with 180 patients for Aim 2 were included. For Aim 1, OSA patients had poorer dry eye profiles of TBUT, Schirmer test, and OSDI when compared to non-OSA patients. For Aim 2, it seemed that those wearing CPAP for less than half a year did not have enough improvement in dry eye status. Instead, those wearing CPAP for at least a year reached greater therapeutic effects for OSA and DED. We concluded that OSA patients may suffer from poorer dry eye condition compared to non-OSA patients. Besides, wearing CPAP for long enough duration (at least 1 year) seemed to have better improvement in DED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.