ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Bio-Interventional Cyclodialysis and Allograft Scleral Reinforcement for Uveoscleral Outflow Enhancement in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients: One-Year Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the one-year safety and effectiveness of bio-interventional cyclodialysis and scleral reinforcement in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients undergoing cataract surgery. Methods: An ab-interno approach was used to create a sectoral cyclodialysis in OAG patients who were prospectively followed in a consecutive case series. Subsequent visco-cycloplasty with scleral reinforcement using homologous minimally modified allograft scaffold was completed to maintain patency of the cyclodialysis reservoir and increase uveoscleral outflow. Outcomes were mean medicated IOP and mean number of IOP-lowering medications. Safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes. Results: Successful cyclodialysis and allograft bio-scaffold reinforcement was achieved in 117 eyes. There was minimal intraoperatie bleeding and few post-operative adverse events. At baseline, mean BCVA was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.42‒0.54; 20/40 Snellen) and mean ± SD medicated IOP was 20.2 ± 6.0 mmHg on 1.4 ± 1.3 IOP-lowering medications. At 12 months, there was a 27.1% reduction from baseline mean medicated IOP. In eyes with medicated baseline IOP > 21 mmHg (n = 45), there was a 39.7% paired IOP reduction at 12 months with a concurrent reduction in the mean number of IOP lowering medications to 0.8 ± 0.9 which were statistically significant (p < 0.01). For all eyes, 81.9% achieved a medicated IOP ≤ 18 mmHg with no increase in medications at 12 months. To achieve target IOP control, secondary glaucoma surgery was performed in 3.2% of the cases. Conclusion: IOP lowering through uveoscleral outflow enhancement can be achieved by means of a bio-interventional cyclodialysis procedure with allograft scleral reinforcement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.