ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Genomic tumor evolution dictates human medulloblastoma progression.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Precision Neuro-Oncology in Glioblastoma: AI-Guided CRISPR Editing and Real-Time Multi-Omics for Genomic Brain Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common high-grade pediatric brain tumor, comprised of 4 main molecular subgroups-sonic-hedgehog (SHH), Wnt, Group 3, and Group 4. Group 3 and Group 4 tumors are the least characterized MB subgroups, despite Group 3 having the worst prognosis (~50% survival rate), and Group 4 being the most prevalent. Such poor characterization can be attributed to high levels of inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, making it difficult to identify common therapeutic targets. Methods: In this study, we generated single-cell sequencing data from 14 MB patients spanning all subgroups that we complemented with publicly available single-cell data from Group 3 patients. We used a ligand-receptor analysis tool (CellChat), expression- and allele-based copy-number variation (CNV) detection methods, and RNA velocity analysis to characterize tumor cell-cell interactions, established a connection between CNVs and temporal tumor progression, and unraveled tumor evolution. Results: We show that MB tumor cells follow a temporal trajectory from those with low CNV levels to those with high CNV levels, allowing us to identify early and late markers for SHH, Group 3, and Group 4 MBs. Our study also identifies Conclusion: Taken together, our findings highlight MB's inherent tumor heterogeneity and offer promising insights into potential drivers of MB tumor evolution particularly in Group 3 and Group 4 MBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.