ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Enhancing clinical decision-making: An externally validated machine learning model for predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation in gliomas using radiomics from presurgical magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of deep learning for predicting glioma isocitrate dehydrogenase and 1p/19q co-deletion in MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Perspective on the integration of radiomics and spatial omics in the analysis of the tumor microenvironment of bladder cancer and prospects for precision diagnosis and treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Precision Neuro-Oncology in Glioblastoma: AI-Guided CRISPR Editing and Real-Time Multi-Omics for Genomic Brain Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Glioma, the most prevalent primary brain tumor, poses challenges in prognosis, particularly in the high-grade subclass, despite advanced treatments. The recent shift in tumor classification underscores the crucial role of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status in the clinical care of glioma patients. However, conventional methods for determining IDH status, including biopsy, have limitations. Exploring the use of machine learning (ML) on magnetic resonance imaging to predict IDH mutation status shows promise but encounters challenges in generalizability and translation into clinical practice because most studies either use single institution or homogeneous datasets for model training and validation. Our study aims to bridge this gap by using multi-institution data for model validation. Methods: This retrospective study utilizes data from large, annotated datasets for internal (377 cases from Yale New Haven Hospitals) and external validation (207 cases from facilities outside Yale New Haven Health). The 6-step research process includes image acquisition, semi-automated tumor segmentation, feature extraction, model building with feature selection, internal validation, and external validation. An extreme gradient boosting ML model predicted the IDH mutation status, confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Results: The ML model demonstrated high performance, with an Area under the Curve (AUC), Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity in internal validation of 0.862, 0.865, 0.885, and 0.713, and external validation of 0.835, 0.851, 0.850, and 0.847. Conclusions: The ML model, built on a heterogeneous dataset, provided robust results in external validation for the prediction task, emphasizing its potential clinical utility. Future research should explore expanding its applicability and validation in diverse global healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.