ArticleHealth science reports2024
Voice Analysis as a Method for Preoperatively Predicting a Difficult Airway Based on Machine Learning Algorithms: Original Research Report.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for predicting perioperative anaesthetic complications and supporting clinical decision-making: a scoping review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Airway Management: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Cureus · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in intensive care units: a scoping review addressing the translational gap to clinical practice.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Article
- An ultrasound-based artificial intelligence framework for difficult airway prediction: A two-model, three-step decision framework.PloS one · 2026Article
- AI-based decision models for difficult airway assessment: from research innovation to clinical implementation-a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: An unanticipated difficult airway is one of the greatest challenges for anesthesiologists. Proper preoperative airway assessment is crucial to reducing complications. However, current screening tests based on anthropometric features are of uncertain benefit. Therefore, our study explores using voice analysis with machine learning algorithms to predict a difficult airway. Methods: Observational, multicenter study with N = 438 patients initially enrolled at Centro Medico Teknon and Institut Universitari Dexeus (2019-2022) for the research study. After excluding 125 patients, N = 313 were included. Ethics committee approval was obtained. Adults ASA I-III scheduled for elective procedures under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were selected. Patient clinical features and traditional predictive tests were collected. Vowels "A, E, I, O, U" were recorded in normal, flexion, and extension positions. Cormack grade was assessed, and data were analyzed using KNIME, resulting in multiple models based on demographics and voice data. ROC curves and other metrics were evaluated for each model. Results: Among multiple models evaluated, two yielded the best performance to predict a difficult airway both exclusively analyzing Cormack I and IV cases which showed the most distinct differences. The variables included in each model were the following: Model 1; included demographic data, vowel "A" in all positions and harmonics of the voice achieving an AUC of 0.91. Model 2; Included demographic data, vowel "O" in normal positions and voice parameters (Shimmer, Jitter, HNR); achieving in an AUC of 0.90. In contrast, models which focused on analyzing all Cormack grades (I, II, III, IV) cases performed less effectively. Conclusions: Acoustic parameters of the voice together with the demographic data of the patients, when introduced into classification algorithms based on machine learning showed promising signs of predicting a difficult airway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.