Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659811›Full record

ArticleEnvironment and behavior2024

Cross-Cultural Applications of the New Ecological Paradigm in Protected Area Contexts.

Leejiah Dorward, Harriet Ibbett, Asri A Dwiyahreni, Edward Kohi, Karlina Prayitno, Stephen Sankeni, Joseph Kaduma, Rose Mawenya, Jesca Mchomvu, Humairah Sabiladiyni and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environment and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Using lessons from criminal justice research to improve conservation law enforcement research and practice.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Leejiah DorwardSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7756-8989
Harriet IbbettSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.
Asri A DwiyahreniResearch Centre for Climate Change, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Edward KohiResearch and Training Unit, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, Dodoma Tanzania.
Karlina PrayitnoSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.
Stephen SankeniSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.
Joseph KadumaSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.
Rose MawenyaSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.
Jesca MchomvuSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.
Humairah SabiladiyniSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.
Andie Wijaya SaputraSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.
Jatna SupriatnaResearch Centre for Climate Change, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Tyassanti TrywidiariniSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.
Freya A V St JohnSchool of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working mostly in Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic countries, environmental psychologists have developed scales assessing relationships between pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors. Working in Tanzanian and Indonesian protected area landscapes, containing important biodiversity and conflict over human-nature interactions, we investigate the utility of the New Ecological Paradigm for measuring pro-environmental beliefs and understanding support for protected area regulations. We found the New Ecological Paradigm ineffective at measuring pro-environmental beliefs in both countries; in Tanzania due to acquiescence bias, and in Indonesia exploratory factor analysis supported none of the original factors, with 4 of 15 statements loading onto a novel "eco-fragility" factor. Individual statements in both countries and the eco-fragility factor in Indonesia were weakly correlated with support for protected area regulations, highlighting while elements of the New Ecological Paradigm can improve understanding of support for protected area regulations, care must be taken when applying psychometric tools in novel cultural contexts.

Indexed as

conservationIndonesianew ecological paradigmpro-environmental beliefsprotected areaspsychometric scalesTanzaniaWEIRD contexts

Identifiers

PMID39659811
PMCPMC7617222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.