ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Assessment of
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential diagnostic value of PAX1 and JAM3 methylation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia between premenopausal and postmenopausal women: a retrospective clinical study in China.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Utility of Cytological Methylation Assay in Cervical Cancer Screening Across Various Cervical Transformation Zones.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Enhanced diagnostic accuracy of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in postmenopausal women through PAX1/JAM3 methylation analysis.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- PAX1/JAM3 methylation in cervical exfoliated cells: a robust diagnostic biomarker for cervical high-grade lesions associated with vaginal dysbiosis.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- HPV-Driven Cervical Carcinogenesis: Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms and Diagnostic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- PAX1/JAM3 methylation-a novel biomarker for early detection and accurate management of cervical adenocarcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2026Review
- HPV16/18 Genotyping Combined With PAX1 Methylation Triage Reduces Immediate Colposcopy While Improving CIN3+ Detection: A Real-World Study of 3,233 Chinese Women.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of Methods: We enrolled women who underwent opportunistic screening at Cervical Disease outpatient clinics of Xuzhou Maternity and Child Health Hospital, and Yueyang Central Hospital from December 2022 to May 2024. The effectiveness of CISCER and cytology tests in triaging hrHPV+ patients was analyzed. Results: Among the 436 study participants, 283 (64.9%) had no cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), while 53 (12.2%) had CIN1, 40 (9.2%) had CIN2, 34 (7.8%) had CIN3, and 26 (5.9%) had cervical cancers. The CISCER tests identified all cases of cervical cancer, particularly 2 hrHPV-negative adenocarcinoma cases. In 396 hrHPV+ individuals, the sensitivity of CISCER tests for detecting CIN2+ lesions was 92.6% (95% CI: 87.2-97.9%), with a specificity of 95.7% (95% CI: 93.4-98%), and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.941 (95% CI: 0.903-0.979), outperforming cytology tests in both HPV16/18+ and non-16/18 hrHPV+ women. Notably, CISCER demonstrated 100% (95% CI: 90-100%) sensitivity in women aged≥50 and 100% (95%CI: 93.6-100%) specificity in women aged<30. Among CIN2+ women, 37.2% (including 3 cancer) showed low-grade cytological changes that could be detected by CISCER. Meanwhile, 52% of CIN2- women exhibited cytological abnormalities but had negative CISCER results. The immediate CIN3+ risk based on positive CISCER results was 54% (95% CI: 43.8-63.9%). Conclusion: The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.