ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
Recommendations for the effective use of T-cell-redirecting therapies: a Canadian consensus statement.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical Guidance for the Expanded Implementation and Provision of Bispecific Antibodies for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Across Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: T-cell-redirecting therapies, such as bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, exploit the cytotoxic capabilities of the immune system to destroy cells expressing specific surface antigens, including malignant cells. These therapies have demonstrated unprecedented rates, depth, and duration of responses in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. However, there are significant challenges in implementing these therapies into practice, which require multidisciplinary and multicenter coordination and significant healthcare resources to effectively manage these patients. So far, there are no Canadian guidelines for the effective implementation and use of T-cell-redirecting therapies. Methods: This consensus statement was developed based on three advisory meetings held in March, July, and November 2023. During these meetings, a panel of Canadian subject matter experts and representation from Myeloma Canada gathered to discuss the optimal procedures for the use of T-cell-redirecting therapies in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Members of the panel performed a thorough review of randomized clinical trials, real-world data, and other current literature, and provided their up-to-date clinical experience with T-cell-redirecting therapies in Canadian practice settings. Subsequently, asynchronous working groups were appointed to develop unified criteria for patient selection, appraise referral pathways, and devise strategies for management of short-term and long-term adverse events arising from the use of T-cell-redirecting therapies in multiple myeloma. Results: Here, we present recommendations for optimizing patient selection, referral pathways, and adverse event management in the Canadian practice setting. These recommendations are relevant for hematologists/oncologists, oncology nurses, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and other providers who treat patients with multiple myeloma, as well as individuals with multiple myeloma and their care partners. These recommendations will be of interest to clinicians who treat patients with MM at community clinics and hospitals and who may be interested in referring patients for T-cell-redirecting therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.