Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659784›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

The diagnostic efficacy of seven autoantibodies in early detection of ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma.

Hua Guo, Wei Zhao, Chunsun Li, Zhen Wu, Ling Yu, Miaoyu Wang, Yuanhui Wei, Zirui Wang, Shangshu Liu, Yue Yin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hua Guo *Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Wei Zhao *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chunsun LiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhen WuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ling YuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Miaoyu WangMedical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Yuanhui WeiSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Zirui WangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shangshu LiuMedical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Yue YinMedical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Zhen YangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liangan ChenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Persistent ground-glass nodules (GGNs) carry a potential risk of malignancy, however, early diagnosis remained challenging. This study aimed to investigate the cut-off values of seven autoantibodies in patients with ground-glass nodules smaller than 3cm, and to construct machine learning models to assess the diagnostic value of these autoantibodies. Methods: In this multi-center retrospective study, we collected peripheral blood specimens from a total of 698 patients. A total of 466 patients with ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma no more than 3cm were identified as a case group based on pathological reports and imaging data, and control group (n=232) of patients consisted of 90 patients with benign nodules and 142 patients with health check-ups. Seven antibodies were quantified in the serum of all participants using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the working characteristic curves of the subjects were plotted to determine the cut-off values of the seven autoantibodies related ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma early. Subsequently, the patients were randomly divided into a training and test set at a 7:3 ratio. Eight machine-learning models were constructed to compare the diagnostic performances of multiple models. The model performances were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). Results: The serum levels of the seven autoantibodies in case group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The combination of the seven autoantibodies demonstrated a significantly enhanced diagnostic efficacy in identifying ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma early when compared to the diagnostic efficacy of the autoantibodies when used respectively. The combined diagnostic approach of the seven autoantibodies exhibited a sensitivity of 84.05%, specificity of 91.85%, and AUC of 0.8870, surpassing the performance of each autoantibody used individually. Furthermore, we determined that Sparrow Search Algorithm-XGBoost (SSA-XGBOOST) had the best diagnostic performance among the models (AUC=0.9265), with MAGEA1, P53, and PGP9.5 having significant feature weight proportions. Conclusions: Our research assessed the diagnostic performance of seven autoantibodies in patients with ground-glass nodules for benign-malignant distinction, and the nodules are all no more than 3cm especially. Our study set cut-off values for seven autoantibodies in identifying GGNs no more than 3cm and constructed a machine learning model for effective diagnosis. This provides a non-invasive and highly discriminative method for the evaluation of ground-glass nodules in high-risk patients.

Indexed as

autoantibodiesdiagnosisearly detectionground-glass noduleslung adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39659784
PMCPMC11628369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.