ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2024
'Mental heAlth and well-being in rUgby pLayers' (MAUL) study: an online survey of diverse cohorts of rugby union players internationally.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endodontic status and oral health in athlete and non-athlete young adults in relation to nutrition and psychological factors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mental health and well-being is a relatively under-researched area in rugby, especially outside the elite men's game. Evidence suggests that physical activity and sports benefit mental health and well-being, and rugby provides health-enhancing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Objective: This cross-sectional study used an online approach and engaged national rugby governing bodies to understand adult rugby players' mental health and well-being and increase the diversity of the current evidence base. Results: 500 rugby players completed an online survey. 44% of participants identified as female, and 55% as male. The UK (67%), Ireland (15%) and South Africa (12%) were the countries with the highest representation. 71% of participants were amateur players, with elite players making up 20% of the population. 87% of players participated in contact forms of the game, with 9% predominantly playing non-contact rugby. Over 50% of participants reported that rugby impacted 'extremely' positively on both their mental health and well-being. Based on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10), 57.8% of all respondents belonged to the 'psychologically well' group. Males were more likely to belong to this group than females (p=0.01). Non-contact and amateur players had lower scores of psychological distress than contact and professional players (p=0.001 and p=0.006), respectively. Non-contact players had higher well-being (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) scores than contact players (p<0.001). Conclusion: This study provides new insights into the mental health and well-being of a diverse group of rugby players.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.