Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659669›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2024

Enhancing negative control selection: A comparative analysis of random and targeted sampling techniques for obtaining High-Quality RNA from normal breast tissue.

Komal Mehta, Archana Sharma, Anurag Mehta, Juhi Tayal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Komal MehtaBiorepository, Department of Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, India.
Archana SharmaBiorepository, Department of Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, India.
Anurag MehtaHistopathology, Department of Laboratory Services, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, India.
Juhi TayalBiorepository, Department of Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0615-9894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular profiling is a crucial aspect of cancer therapy selection, underscoring the necessity for representative sampling of both tumor and normal tissues. While much attention has been given to representative tumor sampling, there has been a notable lack of exploration into the issue of poor RNA quality in normal breast tissue processing. Normal breast tissue from the same patient is often used as a negative control for most "-omics" experiments. RNA extracted from normal breast tissues frequently contains nucleic acids from surrounding adipocytes, endothelial cells, and immune cells, leading to a low representation of ductal elements and skewed results. Therefore, ensuring a complete representation of breast glandular tissue is imperative. The study aimed to investigate the variations in RNA enrichment between a random sampling technique and a targeted sampling approach when visually selecting normal breast tissue sections as negative controls for "-omics" experiments. Fifteen female breast cancer subjects who underwent Modified Radical Mastectomy were selected for the study. Normal Breast tissue was visually examined, and samples were collected from random fat pockets (random sampling) and fibromuscular grey-white streak areas (targeted sampling). RNA was isolated, followed by spectrophotometric analysis, agarose gel electrophoresis and Agilent Tape station analysis. Histopathological assessments and a gene expression study for housekeeping genes were performed on both subsets. Tissues collected through targeted sampling exhibited significantly higher RNA quality than those obtained via random sampling. Histopathological analysis revealed cellular areas abundant in terminal ductular units within the targeted samples, and a final validation qPCR showed that the targeted samples were the most representative of normal breast glandular tissue. The comparative analysis of the two sampling methods clearly indicates that the targeted approach, with its superior accuracy and reliability, is the more practical choice for obtaining representative normal breast glandular tissue for "-omics" experiments.

Indexed as

Breast cancerformalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samplesrandom and targeted tissue samplingRNA isolationtriple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Identifiers

PMID39659669
PMCPMC11631398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.