ArticleBiology methods & protocols2024
Deep learning and transfer learning for brain tumor detection and classification.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable 3D CNNs link regional and network level disruption in early Parkinson's MRIs to symptom progression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Non-invasive identification of mesenchymal glioblastoma using quantitative radiomic features from advanced diffusion MRI: a preclinical-to-clinical transfer learning strategy.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Networks Combining Histopathology and Machine Learning Can Extract Axon Pathology in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are powerful tools that can be trained on image classification tasks and share many structural and functional similarities with biological visual systems and mechanisms of learning. In addition to serving as a model of biological systems, CNNs possess the convenient feature of transfer learning where a network trained on one task may be repurposed for training on another, potentially unrelated, task. In this retrospective study of public domain MRI data, we investigate the ability of neural network models to be trained on brain cancer imaging data while introducing a unique camouflage animal detection transfer learning step as a means of enhancing the networks' tumor detection ability. Training on glioma and normal brain MRI data, post-contrast T1-weighted and T2-weighted, we demonstrate the potential success of this training strategy for improving neural network classification accuracy. Qualitative metrics such as feature space and DeepDreamImage analysis of the internal states of trained models were also employed, which showed improved generalization ability by the models following camouflage animal transfer learning. Image saliency maps further this investigation by allowing us to visualize the most important image regions from a network's perspective while learning. Such methods demonstrate that the networks not only 'look' at the tumor itself when deciding, but also at the impact on the surrounding tissue in terms of compressions and midline shifts. These results suggest an approach to brain tumor MRIs that is comparable to that of trained radiologists while also exhibiting a high sensitivity to subtle structural changes resulting from the presence of a tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.