Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659647›Full record

ReviewSkin appendage disorders2024

Trichoscopy of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia in Caucasians: A Review.

Federico Quadrelli, Stephano Cedirian, Bianca Maria Piraccini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skin appendage disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Androgenetic alopecia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Federico QuadrelliDermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Stephano CedirianDermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Bianca Maria PiracciniDermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a scarring hair loss condition primarily affecting the frontotemporal hairline and often leading to partial or complete loss of eyebrows in a significant number of cases. It is characterized by slow progression and typically shows poor response to available treatments. Diagnosis relies on clinical, trichoscopic, and histopathological assessments, with specific criteria proposed by Vañó-Galván et al. in 2018 [J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(1):e21-2]. Summary: This literature review examines trichoscopic observations of FFA in Caucasians, focusing on both scalp and eyebrow manifestations. A comprehensive search of the PubMed database from 2010 to 2023 yielded 6 relevant articles. Trichoscopic findings varied across studies but highlighted common features such as empty follicles, perifollicular erythema, follicular hyperkeratosis, and the presence of "lonely hair" on the scalp. Additional research is warranted to thoroughly characterize demographic traits and FFA peculiarities within the Caucasian population, given the limited existing data in the literature. Key Messages: Distinct trichoscopic features: trichoscopic examination of FFA among Caucasians reveals specific markers such as empty follicles, perifollicular erythema, and follicular hyperkeratosis, aiding in diagnosis and monitoring. Limited literature data: more investigation is needed to fully understand the demographic characteristics and FFA peculiarities among Caucasians, considering the scarcity of available data in existing literature.

Indexed as

AlopeciaCaucasianFrontal fibrosing alopeciaReviewTrichoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39659647
PMCPMC11627533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.