ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
Effectiveness of work-based educational interventions for antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review.
Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic prescribing practices of community health extension workers in East Central Uganda: an exploratory qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Educational Intervention Improves Antimicrobial Stewardship Knowledge but Reveals Persistent Barriers in Rural Hospitals.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Impact of Hospital-Based Fidaxomicin Use Criteria onInfectious disease reports · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Practices, and Attitudes Regarding Antimicrobial Resistance and Antibiotic Use Among Hospital Staff: Findings from a Two-Round Cross-Sectional Survey in an Italian Tertiary Care Hospital.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An evaluation of the impact of a national facilitated antimicrobial stewardship e-learning course on learners' practice in Egypt.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Online education resources for antimicrobial stewardship in Ethiopia: an educational resource review.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Confidence in antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention among French medical residents: a national cross-sectional survey.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Perspectives of health care professionals and policymakers on antimicrobial stewardship and implementation challenges in low- and middle-income country hospital settings: a qualitative systematic review protocol.JBI evidence synthesis · 2026Article
- Building antimicrobial stewardship capacity through participatory health literacy workshops in Zimbabwe.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- An evaluation of pre-post antimicrobial stewardship healthcare educational intervention studies utilizing the Kirkpatrick model: a scoping review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Improving urine culture appropriateness and reducing unnecessary testing through education and feedback in a hospital setting.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Barriers and Enablers to Optimal Antimicrobial Use in Respiratory Tract Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Antibiotic Resistance Awareness Among University Students in Samborondón, Greater Guayaquil, Ecuador.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing the effects of online educational intervention on pharmaceutical promotions: a pre-post study among medical and pharmacy students in Pakistan.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The pressing need for better antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is invariably reliant on educational interventions in some form. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of post-qualification educational interventions for AMS behaviour change among health professionals. Methods: Seven databases were searched for articles published between 2013 and 2024 for post-qualification educational interventions aimed at health professionals to improve AMS. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental designs such as non-randomised trials, controlled and non-controlled before and after studies, and qualitative studies were considered eligible. The quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) criteria for RCTs and interrupted time series designs, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for all other studies. Data were extracted, analysed for effectiveness, and synthesised narratively. Registration: PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023447115). Results: Forty-six studies were included in the review, with six meeting the EPOC criteria. The remaining forty were assessed using the MMAT. The overall risk of bias for the six studies meeting the EPOC criteria was low, but risk of bias was high for studies assessed using the MMAT. Overall, there was some evidence that formal education alone was effective in this context, but only limited evidence about what type of educational intervention, for which profession, is most effective. Conclusions: Our review provided an in-depth examination of post-qualification AMS interventions. We found studies were heterogeneous and quality of evidence relatively poor. High quality studies focused on establishing key components of effective educational interventions are required.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.