Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659641›Full record

ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024

Effectiveness of work-based educational interventions for antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review.

Darren Langdridge, Jennika Virhia, Rachel McMullan, Duncan Banks, Olivier Biard, Koula Charitonos, Jimmy Patrick Alunyo, Enid Kawala Kagoya, Peter Olupot-Olupot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Darren LangdridgeSchool of Psychology and Counselling, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9319-9802
Jennika VirhiaSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Rachel McMullanSchool of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Duncan BanksSchool of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Olivier BiardGlobal Development Team, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Koula CharitonosInstitute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Jimmy Patrick AlunyoDepartment of Research, Mbale Clinical Research Institute, Mbale, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7897-7730
Enid Kawala KagoyaDepartment of Community Health, Busitema University, Busitema, Uganda.
Peter Olupot-OlupotDepartment of Research, Mbale Clinical Research Institute, Mbale, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5757-609X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The pressing need for better antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is invariably reliant on educational interventions in some form. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of post-qualification educational interventions for AMS behaviour change among health professionals. Methods: Seven databases were searched for articles published between 2013 and 2024 for post-qualification educational interventions aimed at health professionals to improve AMS. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental designs such as non-randomised trials, controlled and non-controlled before and after studies, and qualitative studies were considered eligible. The quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) criteria for RCTs and interrupted time series designs, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for all other studies. Data were extracted, analysed for effectiveness, and synthesised narratively. Registration: PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023447115). Results: Forty-six studies were included in the review, with six meeting the EPOC criteria. The remaining forty were assessed using the MMAT. The overall risk of bias for the six studies meeting the EPOC criteria was low, but risk of bias was high for studies assessed using the MMAT. Overall, there was some evidence that formal education alone was effective in this context, but only limited evidence about what type of educational intervention, for which profession, is most effective. Conclusions: Our review provided an in-depth examination of post-qualification AMS interventions. We found studies were heterogeneous and quality of evidence relatively poor. High quality studies focused on establishing key components of effective educational interventions are required.

Identifiers

PMID39659641
PMCPMC11631219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.