ArticleNanotechnology, science and applications2024
The Substantial Role of Cell and Nanoparticle Surface Properties in the Antibacterial Potential of Spherical Silver Nanoparticles.
Article in Nanotechnology, science and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrically Charged Lipid Nanoparticles as Intracanal Antimicrobial Delivery Systems: A Narrative Review of Preclinical Evidence for Biofilm Control.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Silver Nanoparticles in Antibacterial Research: Mechanisms, Applications, and Emerging Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Harnessing biogenic nanoparticles for combating antibiotic resistance: green synthesis, mechanistic insights, and biotechnological applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Green-Synthesized Nanomaterials from Edible and Medicinal Mushrooms: A Sustainable Strategy Against Antimicrobial Resistance.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Antibacterial Activity of Ciprofloxacin-Based Carbon Dot@Silver Nanoparticle Composites.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Trans-Cinnamaldehyde-Driven Silver Nanoparticles: Dual Role in Targeting Biofilm Disruption and Control of Biofilm‑Forming Pathogens via Impairing Ferrous Ion Uptake.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2025Article
- The Substantial Role of Cell and NanoparticleSurface Properties in the Antibacterial Potential of Spherical Silver Nanoparticles [Letter].Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2025Article
- The Substantial Role of Cell and Nanoparticle Surface Properties in the Antibacterial Potential of Spherical Silver Nanoparticles [Response to Letter].Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Although it is well known that the size, shape, and surface chemistry affect the biological potential of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), the published studies that have considered the influence of AgNP surface on antibacterial activity have not provided conclusive results. This is the first study whose objective was to determine the significance of the surface net charge of AgNPs on their antibacterial potential, attraction to bacterial cells, and cell envelope disruption, considering differences in bacterial surface properties. Methods: We evaluated five commercial AgNP colloids with identical size and shape but different surface ligands. We thoroughly characterized their physicochemical properties, including the zeta potential, hydrodynamic diameter, and polydispersity index, and determined the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC), along with silver absorption into bacterial cells. Moreover, we investigated structural changes in bacteria treated with AgNPs by using a crystal violet assay and electron microscopy. Results: The zeta potential of AgNPs ranged from -47.6 to +68.5 mV, with a hydrodynamic diameter of 29-87 nm and a polydispersity index of 0.349-0.863. Bacterial susceptibility varied significantly (0.5 ≤ MIC ≤ 256 µg Ag/mL; 1 ≤ MBC ≤ 256 µg Ag/mL); we found the lowest susceptibility in bacteria with a cell wall or a polysaccharide capsule. The most active AgNPs (0.5 ≤ MIC ≤ 32 µg Ag/mL; 2 ≤ MBC ≤ 64 µg Ag/mL) had a moderate surface charge (-21.5 and +14.9 mV). The antibacterial potential was unrelated to ion dissolution or cell envelope disruption, and bacterial cells absorbed less of the most active AgNPs (1.75-7.65%). Conclusion: Contrary to previous reports, we found that a moderate surface charge is crucial for the antibacterial activity of AgNPs, and that a significant attraction of the nanoparticle to the cell surface reduces the antibacterial potential of AgNPs. These findings challenge the existing views on AgNP antibacterial mechanisms and interactions with bacterial cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.