Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659538›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Adductor canal block (ACB) plus infiltration of the posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) block versus 4-in-1 block in an arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair: A randomised study.

Ritesh Roy, Gaurav Agarwal, Priyanka Ahuja, Ankita Mohta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ritesh RoyDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0570-5520
Gaurav AgarwalDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, CARE Hospitals, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9059-7204
Priyanka AhujaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3883-6789
Ankita MohtaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, CARE Hospitals, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4247-4270

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair is a common sports-related surgery requiring early rehabilitation. Injection between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (iPACK) provides analgesia to the posterior knee and, when combined with adductor canal block (ACB), can provide complete analgesia for knee surgery. A 4-in-1 block, a single injection, has been studied for analgesia in TKR but not ACL repair. This study was done with the objective of comparing the postoperative analgesia of iPACK + ACB versus 4-in-1 block in ACL repair. Methods: The study was conducted on 184 participants undergoing ACL repair in the age group of 18-70 years. Patients were randomly allocated to iPACK +ACB or 4-in-1 block. After the preoperative and intraoperative protocol, a guided nerve block was performed. The duration of motor blockade of spinal anaesthesia and pain scores were monitored using the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the time for first rescue analgesia was noted at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 hours. An independent sample Results: VAS scores were statistically similar between the two groups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours but were significantly less at 36 hours in group B ( Conclusion: The 4-in-1 block provides non-inferior analgesia compared to the established iPACK plus ACB for arthroscopic ACL surgery.

Indexed as

Analgesiaanterior cruciate ligamentmuscle weaknessnerve blockvisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID39659538
PMCPMC11626880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.