ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024
Comparison of Adequacy of Anaesthesia (AoA) monitors with CONOX
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of hemodynamics and respiratory function between ciprofol-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil in obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Article
- Use of Intra-Operative EEG Monitoring for Nociception Balance Quantification-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Hypothesis reporting in randomised controlled trials: A critical appraisal of IJA 2024 publications.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Adequacy of Anaesthesia (AoA) and CONOX Methods: A randomised trial was conducted in 58 patients. Group A ( Results: Mean sevoflurane consumption was similar between AoA and CONOX groups [13.2 (standard deviation {SD}: 3.9) (95% confidence interval {CI}:11.8, 14.5) versus 14.4 (SD: 3.7) (95% CI: 13.0, 15.7) ml/h] ( Conclusion: Both AoA and CONOX measure anaesthetic depth similarly. However, interpreting qNOX values requires caution, as the patient's consciousness status influences them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.