ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024
Evaluating the predictive efficacy of the El-Ganzouri risk index for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation with King Vision
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluation of the success rate of the semi-sitting position compared with the supine position in the emergency intubation of traumatic patients.International journal of burns and trauma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: El-Ganzouri risk index (EGRI) scoring is a predictive tool for difficult video laryngoscope (VL) guided tracheal intubation, and its use has been studied for various VLs. This study evaluates the predictive value of EGRI scoring for difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with King Vision Methods: Airway assessment was performed preinduction using the EGRI score. Following induction, initial laryngeal visualisation with a Macintosh blade identified the Cormack-Lehane grade. Final laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were done using the King Vision Results: A total of 250 patients were included in the study, and the cut-off value of EGRI was 4. EGRI was assessed using the POGO and Fremantle scores for the view obtained during VL. The optimal cut-off for EGRI score was 3. ROC for difficult airways was calculated and compared to other scores. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were 82%, 86% and 0.9, respectively, for the POGO score and 74%, 92% and 0.85, respectively, for the Fremantle score. The ease of tube placement when assessed using a modified intubation difficulty scale was evaluated, and the sensitivity, specificity and AUC values were 95%, 86% and 0.94, respectively. Conclusion: EGRI scoring can effectively predict difficult laryngoscopy and intubation with the King Vision
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.