Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659531›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Evaluating the predictive efficacy of the El-Ganzouri risk index for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation with King Vision

Aneeta Elizabeth Baby, Moses Charles D'souza, Mathangi Krishnakumar, Dicin Davis Kavalakkatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aneeta Elizabeth BabyDepartment of Anaesthesia, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4973-6020
Moses Charles D'souzaSurgical and Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6252-3603
Mathangi KrishnakumarSurgical and Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9225-3165
Dicin Davis KavalakkattDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3433-1743

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: El-Ganzouri risk index (EGRI) scoring is a predictive tool for difficult video laryngoscope (VL) guided tracheal intubation, and its use has been studied for various VLs. This study evaluates the predictive value of EGRI scoring for difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with King Vision Methods: Airway assessment was performed preinduction using the EGRI score. Following induction, initial laryngeal visualisation with a Macintosh blade identified the Cormack-Lehane grade. Final laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were done using the King Vision Results: A total of 250 patients were included in the study, and the cut-off value of EGRI was 4. EGRI was assessed using the POGO and Fremantle scores for the view obtained during VL. The optimal cut-off for EGRI score was 3. ROC for difficult airways was calculated and compared to other scores. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were 82%, 86% and 0.9, respectively, for the POGO score and 74%, 92% and 0.85, respectively, for the Fremantle score. The ease of tube placement when assessed using a modified intubation difficulty scale was evaluated, and the sensitivity, specificity and AUC values were 95%, 86% and 0.94, respectively. Conclusion: EGRI scoring can effectively predict difficult laryngoscopy and intubation with the King Vision

Indexed as

Difficult airwayEl-Ganzouri risk index scoringFremantle scoreintubation difficulty scaleKing Vision™ video laryngoscopelaryngoscopyPOGO scoretracheal intubation

Identifiers

PMID39659531
PMCPMC11626877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.