ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024
A patch-based deep learning MRI segmentation model for improving efficiency and clinical examination of the spinal tumor.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate Segmentation and Three-dimensional Reconstruction Algorithm of Spinal Cord Injury Lesions Based on Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Urological diagnostics based on kidney stone detection in CT imaging using YOLOv8 deep learning framework.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a vital role in diagnosing spinal diseases, including different types of spinal tumors. However, conventional segmentation techniques are often labor-intensive and susceptible to variability. This study aims to propose a full-automatic segmentation method for spine MRI images, utilizing a convolutional-deconvolution neural network and patch-based deep learning. The objective is to improve segmentation efficiency, meeting clinical needs for accurate diagnoses and treatment planning. Methods: The methodology involved the utilization of a convolutional neural network to automatically extract deep learning features from spine data. This allowed for the effective representation of anatomical structures. The network was trained to learn discriminative features necessary for accurate segmentation of the spine MRI data. Furthermore, a patch extraction (PE) based deep neural network was developed using a convolutional neural network to restore the feature maps to their original image size. To improve training efficiency, a combination of pre-training and an enhanced stochastic gradient descent method was utilized. Results: The experimental results highlight the effectiveness of the proposed method for spine image segmentation using Gadolinium-enhanced T1 MRI. This approach not only delivers high accuracy but also offers real-time performance. The innovative model attained impressive metrics, achieving 90.6% precision, 91.1% recall, 93.2% accuracy, 91.3% F1-score, 83.8% Intersection over Union (IoU), and 91.1% Dice Coefficient (DC). These results indicate that the proposed method can accurately segment spine tumors CT images, addressing the limitations of traditional segmentation algorithms. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study introduces a fully automated segmentation method for spine MRI images utilizing a convolutional neural network, enhanced by the application of the PE-module. By utilizing a patch extraction based neural network (PENN) deep learning techniques, the proposed method effectively addresses the deficiencies of traditional algorithms and achieves accurate and real-time spine MRI image segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.