Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659511›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024

Using Pathomics-Based Model for Predicting Positive Surgical Margins in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of Decision Tree and Nomogram.

Ze Tang, Shiyun Feng, Qing Liu, Yunze Ban, Yan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ze Tang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Shiyun Feng *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Qing LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Yunze BanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has a high incidence and mortality rate. Postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM) often correlate with poor prognosis. This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for PSM positivity in ESCC patients, with the potential to guide preoperative planning and improve patient outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1776 patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University between January 2015 and December 2023. Patients with visible residual tumors (R2) or microscopic residual tumors (R1) at the surgical margins were classified as having PSM. High-dimensional pathological features were extracted from digital pathological sections using CellProfiler software. The selected features were used to develop a predictive model based on decision trees and generalized linear regression, and the model was validated in an independent cohort. Clinically significant pathological factors (P < 0.05) were included in multivariate logistic regression for further validation. The model's performance was assessed using calibration curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, generated with the Bootstrap method. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to evaluate the clinical utility of the predictive model. Results: A total of 229 patients (12.89%) were diagnosed with PSM. Logistic regression analysis identified multifocal lesions, vascular invasion, and pathomics-based features as independent predictors of PSM. The predictive model, represented by a decision tree, demonstrated good discrimination with an area under the ROC curve of 0.899 (95% CI: 0.842-0.956, P < 0.001), and a strong calibration curve between the predicted probability and the actual probability. Additionally, the nomogram demonstrated slightly inferior discrimination with an area under the ROC curve of 0.803 (95% CI: 0.734-0.872, P < 0.001) in the training cohort. Conclusion: Our study successfully established and validated a pathology-based predictive model for PSM risk, which could enhance preoperative evaluation and inform treatment strategies for ESCC.

Indexed as

esophageal squamous cell carcinomamachine learningpathomicsprediction modelsurgical margin

Identifiers

PMID39659511
PMCPMC11629666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.