ArticleJournal of patient experience2024
Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Pediatric Healthcare-A Rapid Evidence Assessment.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using cognitive interviews with children to test the content validity of a paediatric patient reported experience measure.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Integrating optimal patient-centered care: patient- and family-reported experiences after complex treatment for rare diseases.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Co-Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Trans and Gender Diverse Young People: A Multi-Stage Participatory Study Protocol.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Beyond one-size-fits-all: sensory regulation and age-specific design in pediatric healthcare environments.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Parent Experiences During Child Hospitalization in an International Cohort: A Qualitative Descriptive Study Guided by Family-Centered Care Principles and the Socio-Ecological Model.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Physician Empathy as Perceived by Parents of Children with Psychiatric Disorders: A Quantitative Analysis of Pediatric Consultations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Validating a codesigned paediatric patient reported experience measure: a study protocol.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to describe what is known in the scientific literature about patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in pediatric healthcare and identify areas for further exploration. PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, COCHRANE, and SveMed+ combined with free text search in FireFox and Safari web browsers using Medical Subject Headings terms were used. Outcomes of interest were patient experience and measures of these constructs. Of the 316 studies identified, 68 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-eight studies (72%) were published between 2015 and 2020 and more than half (53%) were published in Europe. Most studies of PREMs in pediatric healthcare included adult proxies as participants. Seventy-eight percent of studies consisted of > 100 participants. Thirty-six studies (53%) were quantitative studies, 26 (38%) were evaluative studies of patient experience measures, and 6 (9%) were qualitative in design. Three hundred eleven domains were identified and further categorized into 14 domain areas. This research is important because it aims to amplify the voices of children in healthcare and establish a foundation for developing validated pediatric-PREMs that is grounded in children's firsthand experiences of care, rather than relying primarily on proxy accounts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.