Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659421›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

High-resolution dendrometer measurements reveal different responses of Douglas-fir to extreme drought in 2018 depending on soil and rooting characteristics.

Göran Spangenberg, Reiner Zimmermann, Manfred Küppers, Sebastian Hein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Göran SpangenbergDepartment of Silviculture, University of Applied Forest Sciences Rottenburg, Rottenburg am Neckar, Germany.
Reiner ZimmermannForest Ecology and Remote Sensing Group, Department 190a, Institute of Biology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Manfred KüppersDepartment 190a, Institute of Biology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Sebastian HeinDepartment of Silviculture, University of Applied Forest Sciences Rottenburg, Rottenburg am Neckar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Douglas-fir ( Methods: We selected seven closely spaced sites along a soil texture gradient from sand to clay at an elevation of ca. 500 m a.s.l. in southern Germany and determined soil physical and rooting characteristics. Water status parameters and growth duration were derived from dendrometer data at five Douglas-firs per site. The influence of soil and rooting characteristics on these drought stress-related parameters was analyzed using mixed-effects models. The focus was on two summer drought periods in 2018. Results and discussion: In the initial stage of the extreme summer drought of 2018 (in June), a higher PAWC and a higher fine root density reduced drought stress. However, these influences were no longer noticeable in the later stage of drought (in August), probably due to deeper soil desiccation. In August, a higher effective rooting depth reduced drought stress. Soil texture had a significant influence, particularly on growth duration. This study provides information on site selection for Douglas-fir cultivation under the predicted increase in severe drought, showing the importance of deep and intensive rooting, and points to the need for combined above- and belowground investigations for a better understanding of the drought response patterns of tree species.

Indexed as

dendrometerextreme drought stressgrowth durationnon-native tree speciesPseudotsuga menziesiirooting characteristicssoil texturetree water deficit

Identifiers

PMID39659421
PMCPMC11628273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.