Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659402›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Monkey king evolution (MKE)-GA-SVM model for subtype classification of breast cancer.

Suvobrata Sarkar, Kalyani Mali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suvobrata SarkarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Dr B.C Roy Engineering College, Durgapur, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1902-1050
Kalyani MaliDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Recently, numerous research studies have concentrated on employing hybrid metaheuristic approaches for the analysis and diagnosis of breast cancer which motivated us to devise a computer-driven diagnostic tool that could aid in improving the precision of clinical decision-making. Methods: In the present study, an integrated metaheuristic machine learning approach-based predictive model was developed that can classify breast cancer into subgroups using clinicopathological data acquired from tertiary care hospitals or oncological institutes. Results: Monkey king evolution (MKE) was utilized to refine the hyperparameters of the support vector machine to achieve optimal settings, and genetic algorithm (GA) was used to choose the pertinent clinical and pathological attributes involved in classification before being applied to the support vector machine (SVM) classifier for prediction. A comparison was conducted between the results of the integrated MKE-GA-SVM model and those derived from conventional feature selection and hyperparameter tuning models such as GA-SVM, grid search-SVM, and SVM-recursive feature elimination (RFE). The effectiveness of the results was evaluated by applying the 10-fold cross-validation technique to the three multicentre datasets across all models. The integrated machine learning (ML) model achieved classification accuracies of 91.4%, 86.6%, and 75.5% across three clinicopathological breast cancer datasets, outperforming the existing models. The generated model performance was also assessed with notable metrics, namely F1-score, precision-recall curve, area under the ROC curve, mean square error and logarithmic loss. Conclusion: Thus, the newly developed bio-inspired integrated metaheuristic model may be deployed as a surrogate diagnostic tool that allows clinicians to offer patients with better therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

classificationgenetic algorithmintegrated metaheuristic modelMonkey king evolutionsupport vector machinetriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID39659402
PMCPMC11629432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.