ArticleSpine surgery and related research2024
Artificial Intelligence Classification for Detecting and Grading Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Potential applications of artificial intelligence in pain management: a scoping review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- EADC-Net: A Dual-Stage Deep Learning Framework with Spatial and Channel Central Attention for Automated Detection of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease from Radiographs.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A Systematic Literature Review of You Only Look Once Architectures (v1-v12) in Healthcare Systems.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- SpineScan: a deep learning model for lumbar spine MRI annotation and Pfirrmann grading assessment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- METTL3-mediated GLUD1 m6A Modification Promotes Hydrogen Peroxide-induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells Via the Glutamate/α-KG Metabolic Axis.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and robotic technologies redefining precision and personalization in orthopedic surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical Application of Deep Learning for Spine MRI Interpretation: A Multicenter Evaluation of Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted versus Manual Reading on Diagnostic Agreement with the Reference Standard.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is a primary cause of chronic back pain and disability, highlighting the need for precise detection and grading for effective treatment. This study focuses on developing and validating a convolutional neural network (CNN) with a You Only Look Once (YOLO) architecture model using the Pfirrmann grading system to classify and grade lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Methods: We developed a deep learning model trained on a dataset of anonymized MRI studies of patients with symptomatic back pain. MRI images were segmented and annotated by radiologists according to the Pfirrmann grading for the datasets. The segmentation MRI-disc image dataset was prepared for three groups: a training set (1,000), a testing set (500), and an external validation set (500) to assess model generalizability without overlapping images. The model's performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, prediction error, and ROC-AUC. Results: The AI model showed high performance across all metrics. For Grade I IDD, the model achieved an accuracy of 97%, 95%, and 92% in the training, testing, and external validation sets, respectively. For Grade II, the sensitivity was 100% in both training and testing sets and 98% in the validation set. For Grade III, the specificity was 95.4% in the training set and 94% in both testing and validation sets. For Grade IV, the F1 score was 97.77% in the training set and 95% in both testing and validation sets. For Grade V, the prediction error was 2.3%, 2%, and 2.5% in the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively. The overall ROC-AUC was 97%, 92%, and 95% in the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively. Conclusions: The AI-based classification model exhibits high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in detecting and grading lumbar IDD using the Pfirrmann grading. AI has significantly enhanced diagnostic precision and reliability, providing a powerful tool for clinicians in managing IDD. The potential impact is substantial, although further clinical validation is necessary before integrating this model into routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.