ArticleSpine surgery and related research2024
Posterior Instrumentation without Curettage Promotes Rapid Restoration of Adult Spinal Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- What to do to beat Langerhans cell histiocytosis of bone? A narrative review and case series of radiofrequency ablation.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Intradural extramedullary eosinophilic granuloma of the spine with emergency presentation: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adult spinal Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) presents a treatment challenge due to ongoing controversies. Traditional approaches such as curettage with bone grafting and internal fixation are preferred for severe cases involving mechanical instability, neurological deficits, or deformity. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of a customized approach involving simple posterior instrumentation without curettage or bone grafting in treating adult spinal LCH. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed a prospectively maintained database of all spine surgeries conducted at our institute from April 2013 to December 2020. Adult patients (age≥20) diagnosed with LCH were included. We assessed surgical methods, adjuvant therapy, and clinical results, such as perioperative progression of disease, symptoms, and recurrence. Results: Four male patients aged between 21 and 28, each with a single spinal LCH lesion (T6, T5, and C5) except one case (T5 and T7), were treated. Diagnoses were confirmed via biopsy (two open, two needle biopsies). Whole-body computed tomography or bone scintigraphy revealed no additional LCH lesions in any patient, except in one patient with a small lung nodule. All patients presented with severe back or neck pain and pathological fractures at the affected vertebra. Thoracic LCH cases received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, while the cervical case was managed with conventional posterior instrumentation using lateral mass screws. After surgery, all patients experienced significant pain relief, halted bone lysis, and rapid new bone formation. One patient underwent chemotherapy postsurgery. Over 3 years of follow-up, imaging studies revealed no recurrences of the disease. Conclusions: Posterior instrumentation, without the need for curettage or bone grafting, is a promising surgical treatment for adult spinal LCH. This method may effectively halt lesion progression, prevent spinal deformity, and avert neurological deficits in the patients with progressive spine lesion where conservative treatment may not adequately prevent vertebral fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.