Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659360›Full record

ArticleWomen's studies international forum

Sukanya Paradkar, Chatush Singh, Anand Suryavanshi, Apurva Tiwari, Beniamino Cislaghi, Nayreen Daruwalla, David Osrin, Lu Gram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's studies international forum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sukanya ParadkarSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.
Chatush SinghSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.
Anand SuryavanshiSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.
Apurva TiwariSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.
Beniamino CislaghiLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Nayreen DaruwallaSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.
David OsrinInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lu GramInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite striking gender differences in men's and women's engagement in past prevention programmes to stop violence against women (VAW), few empirical studies have determined why such gender differences arise. We did a grounded theory study of a large-scale NGO programme in informal settlements in Mumbai, India, aiming to analyse how gender affects participation in community action to address VAW. We did 27 focus group discussions and 31 semi-structured interviews with 77 women and 36 men, as well as with 9 NGO staff. We supplemented qualitative data with quantitative monitoring data on referrals to NGO counselling centres. We found that male participants in the NGO programme not only reported violence to the NGO at lower rates but took less intensive action to support survivors. When they did engage, they more often defended perpetrators or asked survivors to accommodate them than female participants. These differences could be explained by a greater (1) affective response to VAW (2) perceived stake in addressing VAW (3) sense of empowerment from taking action, and (4) perceived NGO support for self among women compared to men. Differences were evident even between male and female participants who had taken part in NGO activities for years. We theorise that these differences ultimately stem from men and women's structurally different position in a gender unequal society. Our findings identify key motivational barriers to address to improve the effectiveness of programmes to prevent VAW. Given the greater barriers to men's community action compared to women's community action, it may be useful to recognize the value of prevention programmes with differing levels of male engagement, including women-only programmes and programmes in which male community participants play a secondary role and are not expected to be as active as female participants.

Indexed as

Bystander actionCommunity healthCommunity participationIndiaInformal settlementsMale engagementSouth AsiaViolence against women

Identifiers

PMID39659360
PMCPMC11625700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.