Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659352›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Clinical Assessment and Factors Influencing Treatment Strategy and Outcomes in Complex Limb Injuries.

Liam Donnelly, Henry J Mills

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liam DonnellyTrauma and Orthopaedics, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Henry J MillsOrthopaedics, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex limb injuries are high-energy injuries that may threaten limb viability and confer significant morbidity and mortality. Prompt clinical assessment and decision-making are critical to determining the optimal management strategy, i.e., limb salvation or amputation. A clinical assessment based on advanced trauma life support (ATLS) principles is conducted to identify injuries that threaten life or limb. Patients' physiological status is evaluated using validated scoring tools, such as the injury severity score, to identify high-risk individuals who may need treatment following damage control orthopedic principles. Clinicians must assume a high degree of suspicion of vascular injury and may reliably use CT angiography to detect clinically relevant vascular injuries. Several clinical tools have been developed to help decide between primary amputation or salvation of mangled limbs; however, none have proven valid as sole indicators. Decision-making must involve the consideration of a multitude of injury- and patient-related variables in addition to clinical scoring systems. This review provides an outline of the clinical assessment and factors influencing treatment strategy and outcomes in complex limb injuries based on current evidence.

Indexed as

complex limb injuriescrush injuriesdamage control orthopaedicsinjury severity scores (iss)limb reconstruction surgerylimb-salvagemajor limb amputationmangled extremity severity scoremangled limborthoplastic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39659352
PMCPMC11628192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.